Here's a good example of Garrison's theory of propinquity at play. Clay Shaw lived on Burgundy Street in 1960, so Garrison looked at phone directories to see who else lived there.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/91092/91092b332e335d06dc15b53f83b6d647b8ecdfb7" alt=""
Mr. Todd, because he lived on Burgundy Street, needed to be investigated. The last sentence is important – Garrison had this belief that one of the gunmen on the grassy knoll had a scar on his face.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9cfa1/9cfa146d35e20a138663a0536e128ea43ec83131" alt=""
Investigating Mr. Todd led to Mr. Bertram. He was now a suspect because he lived across the street from a bar that Clay Bertrand supposedly went to.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57b5b/57b5bae43eda5d5fb7774cb99726c9cec00f26ca" alt=""
None of this went anywhere. But then, this is where propinquity takes you.